There are so many bad ideas and erroneous claims that none of us should be expected to take the time to validate the bullshit. If I think that there are fembots on the surface of Venus, I've got to find evidence. The evidence needs to be testable and falsifiable. The evidence must have a direct relationship with whatever that I claim (voluptuous fembots in this instance). If the evidence is insufficient or erroneous, then nobody needs to go any farther in the search for robotic female Venetians. Really. Don't bother. You would be wasting your time. I made it up.
It would be fantastic if there were fembots. I imagine that they would be sort of like the fembots from the Austin Powers film, only with real tits instead of gun-boobs. This all sounds sexist and kind of dumb, but I'm not talking about feminism, I'm talking about religion.
Nobody in their right mind should be doing the things that they are doing and believing the nonsense that they are believing based on a declared absence of evidence. It doesn't matter if it sounds good. It would be nice if a lot of other baseless, nonsensical fantasies were true, but they are not. Our whimsical fantasies have no viable evidence, cannot be 'proven' false, and should be tabled, indefinitely as anthropological remnants of early human sociology. Period. Suggested reading for the budding contrarian or emerging atheist:
- The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster
- Letters to a Young Contrarian
- Christopher Hitchens
- Beginnings: The Story of Origins - of Mankind, Life, the Earth, the Universe
- The God Delusion
